sixstringphonic:
inneskeeper:
man call me crazy or whatever but i’m not very thrilled with the fact that the takeaway that all of y'all are getting from the titanic submarine crisis happening right now is
“People able to spend exorbitantly for some tourist trip thing deserve to die a horrific and torturous death via suffocation after spending 96 hours in mounting dread and awareness of that oncoming reality, all inside a 20 foot long windowless iron casket lost at sea”
and how it isn’t
“There is no way in fucking hell that it should be legal to take people into such high-risk environments with zero regulations and shoddy work which almost certainly factored if not is the cause of this crisis to begin with, and the problem isn’t that people will spend lots of money on dumb shit, it’s that there are companies allowed to prey on that with no oversight”
To that effect, the New York Times is now reporting:
Leaders in the submersible vehicle industry sent a letter to Oceangate’s chief executive, Stockton Rush, in 2018 warning that “the current ‘experimental’ approach” of the company could result in problems, “from minor to catastrophic.” The letter was obtained by The New York Times and confirmed by one of the signatories. It was not immediately clear whether Oceangate had responded.